One office action, decomposed.
A non-final rejection enters the record — logged and sourced the moment it lands. Every rejection, reference, and deadline accounted for.
PurpleBrain Patent is a prosecution harness for the AI you already use. It breaks applications, office actions, and prior art into sourced pieces — every assertion anchored to spec, claim, or reference — and runs an examiner-grade adversarial review before anything carries your signature.
The question isn't whether AI helps you draft. It's whether anything unsupported survives to your signature.
Scroll to follow one rejection from the mailbox to a response you can sign.
A non-final rejection enters the record — logged and sourced the moment it lands. Every rejection, reference, and deadline accounted for.
Each one carries its statute, its references, and its exact page. Not summaries — receipts.
A proposed amendment reads well — but the specification doesn't teach it. Most tools would file it. This one stops.
The amendment is rewritten in the words the spec actually teaches. The unsupported term is retired — visibly, with the decision preserved.
The response assembles from supported language only — spec paragraphs, reference columns, exact lines. Then it waits for the only thing that matters: your signature.
PurpleBrain Patent is not another platform, and it doesn't bundle the AI into an opaque fee. The AI is the subscription you already pay for — you know that cost to the dollar. Your PurpleBrain seat buys the harness around it: the discipline, the checkpoints, the receipts. Two line items you can read. And your files stay where your data agreement already lives — no new vendor holding your client documents.
The harness drives Claude and Gemini today — both with million-token context windows, so a full file wrapper fits in a single pass. ChatGPT and Copilot are next: the core routes by provider, so each new assistant is an addition, not a rewrite.
The USPTO itself is moving the same direction: its examiner-side AI requires every suggestion to be traceable to a source. A prosecution built on source-anchored pieces meets the examination process on its own terms.
Built inside live prosecution before the USPTO — provisionals, non-provisionals, same-day PCT filings, office-action strategy — not a demo lab.
Bring your hardest document set to a working session. We'll show you what a knowledge layer that cites its sources can find in it.
Not a practitioner? We work with a small number of serious inventors, by application.
Your message goes to a person who can act on it — not a queue, not a list. We don't publish or share your contact details.
Tell us what kind of knowledge is scattered, where it lives, and what your team needs to answer.