One office action, decomposed.
A non-final rejection enters the record — logged and sourced the moment it lands. Every rejection, reference, and deadline accounted for.
PurpleBrain Patent works with the AI you already use. It breaks applications, office actions, and prior art into sourced pieces — every assertion anchored to spec, claim, or reference — and runs an examiner-grade adversarial review before anything carries your signature.
The question isn't whether AI helps you draft. It's whether anything unsupported survives to your signature.
Scroll to follow one rejection from the mailbox to a response you can sign.
A non-final rejection enters the record — logged and sourced the moment it lands. Every rejection, reference, and deadline accounted for.
Each one carries its statute, its references, and its exact page. Not summaries — receipts.
A proposed amendment reads well — but the specification doesn't teach it. Most tools would file it. This one stops.
The amendment is rewritten in the words the spec actually teaches. The unsupported term is retired — visibly, with the decision preserved.
The response assembles from supported language only — spec paragraphs, reference columns, exact lines. Then it waits for the only thing that matters: your signature.
PurpleBrain Patent is not another platform, and it doesn't bundle the AI into an opaque fee. The AI is the subscription you already pay for — you know that cost to the dollar. Your PurpleBrain seat buys the discipline around it: the checks, the sign-offs, the receipts. Two line items you can read — so your pricing stays transparent. And your files stay where your engagement's terms already live, fully portable — no new vendor holding your clients' unfiled inventions.
It works with Claude and Gemini today — both with million-token context windows, so a full file wrapper fits in a single pass. ChatGPT and Copilot are next: the core routes by provider, so each new assistant is an addition, not a rewrite.
The USPTO itself is moving the same direction: its examiner-side AI requires every suggestion to be traceable to a source. A prosecution built on source-anchored pieces meets the examination process on its own terms.
Built inside live prosecution before the USPTO — provisionals, non-provisionals, same-day PCT filings, office-action strategy — not a demo lab.
Book a working session — bring a live rejection or a hard application, and see it answered with every assertion tied to its source.
Not a practitioner? We work with a small number of serious inventors, by application.
Your message will be answered by a real person.
Tell us what kind of knowledge is scattered, where it lives, and what your team needs to answer.